Home | Articles | Sex | Toys | Videotape | Pornstars | XXX Pay Per View

Saturday, December 31, 2005

Sex Toy Info: Head's Up!

From the Men-are-one-step-closer-to-becoming-sexually-obsolete file comes the Talking Head Vibrator ...

As you can read from the info at the site, the apparatus consists of a vibrator (duh) which comes with pre-recorded dialogues. The device also gives one (perhaps the woman’s lover) the option to record his own voice on it for future playback.

I wrote a previous entry about the Highjoy Internet Enabled Rabbit which allows a person to maneuver his/her female partner’s sextoy via the web (I‘m still not completely sure how that works exactly). So to some degree, one can feel as if one has some control over a lover’s orgasm.

Now - with the advent of Talking Head - you don’t even have to be that hands on. All you have to do is send your voice file via email with the right file extension, and your favorite woman will, ahem, take care of the rest.

(And by the way, wouldn’t you as a woman think it’s a little weird to have a disembodied voice coming out of your vagina as you’re using your vibrator? That sounds like a good plot for a Twilight Zone episode; I’ll get back to you on that one...)

I have to admit, this is one toy as a guy that makes me a little jealous. Up until now, I’d never been threatened in the least by a standard dildo, dong, or vibrator . After all, women - a lot of times - are all about the emotional experience of sex, and how the orgasm-provider (that sounds so technical and un-inspired, I know) makes them feel inside. And 6 to 12 inches of plastic, rubber, latex, glass, or Cyberskin couldn’t offer anything in the way of emotional attachment that I couldn’t compete with.

But now with this little gizmo, a lot of women will - consciously or sub-consciously - make the mental connection between both sexual bodily satisfaction and mental/emotional pleasure. The bottomline is that if my girl were to have this, she wouldn't need me or miss me as much. :(

Although, I’ll have to admit, a couple of those foreign language voice-overs sound very convincing - and I don‘t even understand any of those languages! I wouldn’t blame a girl for getting hooked on those sound chips . You don’t believe me? Listen to some of the samples here. My favorite is Latin Lover Enriq - excuse me - Juan.

What’s next? Where is technology going in the evolution of the female adult toy experience? The next thing you know, there will be a bedroom ceiling attachment consisting of two big biceps that lower at the touch of a button (conveniently accessible from your night stand, no doubt), and engulfs a woman in its warm, muscular embrace.

But, as I said to all the ladies in my review of another sex device called the Thrillhammer , the Talking Head won’t cuddle with you, nor will it kill that spider for you, nor will it change your kitchen light bulb. So there...

Wednesday, December 28, 2005

A Site That's Doing it Ass-Black-ward...

I try to keep this blog page as unbiased as I can: I’d recommend a paysite that’s my particular brand of porn even if I didn’t own that paysite or even if it was not one of my sponsors. (Besides, if I like the site enough, I can always sign up for its affiliate program later on anyway…)

I just found a new site on the web called Butts and Blacks . As you can imagine it’s an interracial site featuring (non-ebony) women with junks in their trunks, and the brothas who love them.

For those who are familiar with the more renowned gluteally (I know, it’s not a word) enhanced Latin, Asian, and Caucasian women in porn, the site seems to showcase the usual suspects: Katja Kassin, Olivia O’Lovely, Sara Jay, etc. And some curvaceous lovelies you might not have heard of yet.

Moreover, if you sign up it says that you get access to 9 other sites, which also feature women who are mostly of the big butt or big boob persuasion. If you’re one of those porn connoisseurs who refuse to rush headlong into anything, you can try out their 2-day trial membership for $3. I’m not sure if the 9-site access is included in the trial, but with all the episodes that B&B itself contains, how much porn can you go through in 48 hours anyway?

I usually pay for a trial membership in evaluating a site, but I’m afraid I’ll get hooked, being a big fan of the genre. I’d get absolutely nothing done for 2 whole days, because I’d have to see every photo and video available to get my 3 bucks-worth. But that’s another story…

So if you’re a big butt lover like myself, check it out. Tia Sweets is one of those bootylicious babes waiting for you. ;)

Thursday, December 22, 2005

Merry XXX-mas

Like I always say, there are no sacred holidays around here, so here are some Christmas pics for your enjoyment. I usually don't post gay pics or links to gay sex on this blog page, but what the heck? It's the season of being magnanimous, and going above and beyond. :) (Besides, these are all the holiday pics that I have...)

Monday, December 19, 2005

Pornstar News: Good-bye, Good Night, and Good Luck

As large as it may seem, the adult industry is a somewhat tightly-knit fraternity (or should I say sorority since it is the women that are largely the industry’s stars?). A lot of the performers, even if they’ve never worked together, pretty much know of or have heard of a lot of their colleagues in the business.

So even when a starlet who is not as well known dies, the news reverberates within the industry. I just thought it’d be nice to point out the passing of an adult performer, seeing how I make money on these performers as a whole.

I’d just like to take this opportunity to say farewell to Jasmine Grey . As you can see from the photos below, she was a very beautiful woman. She will be missed…



Switching gears, in case you don’t know by now, the sun is setting on Taylor (motherfuckin’) Rain’s career in front of the camera. She is retiring from performing. She’s still going to direct adult films for the Torrid/Defiance company, though. What she lacked in terms of voluptuousness (read big boobs) she certainly made up for in sexual proclivity: she was a real filthy fucker and I say that with all due respect.

She has a reasonably new site (her regular pay site, taylorrainxxx.com, doesn't seem to be up any longer) that she “inherited” at Lukeford.com . It’s a porn gossip site, and it seems to be a project she can work on in her free time, in lieu of performing. Considering that she once expressed interest in rapping (or maybe she just wanted to do 50cent, I forget), I’d say that the Lukeford site is a good thing. Pornstar turned rapper? Not so much of a good thing (see Heather Hunter and Jake Steed)…




“Whatever Happened To…?”, Part VII: For all you fans of 90s porn, the one and only Taylor Hayes is making a comeback; which is great. She’s signed up with Seymour Butts’ new talent agency .
What I never knew (until recently) was that she and Butts had a kid together. Would that kid happen to be Brady, the one that I felt sorry for in my review of Butts’ Family Business DVD? Well, good luck to her on her road back to stardom; and in the meantime maybe she can help out with the kid’s therapy bills…

Saturday, December 17, 2005

20 Questions, Live and Direct style

I watched the Rita Cosby Live and Direct show on the topic of Porn Valley and I wanted to discuss it. Then I realized that the piece raised more questions in my mind than it answered. Note that a lot of these queries are of a rhetorical nature…

1.) When they said 20% of (American, I believe) men view pornography at work, what does that really mean? If only, say, a quarter (25%) of all men have access, opportunity, or time to engage in porn at work in the first place, then that 20% figure doesn‘t really say much…

2.) Why do both porn producers and parents always try to put the burden of restricting the access of minors to porn on the other party? On the one hand, I heard Steven Hirsch, Vivid Entertainment co-founder and president, claim it’s the parent’s job to monitor their kids. Yet on the other hand, legislators - who are parents in their own right - recently proposed a sin tax bill that would ultimately make some of the proceeds from adult sales pay for the task of shielding underage kids from porn. 3.) Shouldn’t the onus rest on both groups (porn mongers and parents/guardians alike)?

The stats say that , “Seventy percent of men between the ages of 18 and 34 look at porn at least once a month.” 4.) Yes, but what is the average number of times monthly, nay daily, for each man in that group? That would be a really telling stat…

Porn director and cross-dresser Chi Chi Larue spends quite a bit of time going back and forth in terms of dressing as a man and dressing as his female alter-ego. 5.) Since he was sporting some semblance of a beard in the piece does that mean he hasn‘t been a transvestite in a while? 6.) How long does it take this guy to grow a beard, or is he limited to 5 o‘clock shadows for the rest of his cross-dressing days? Not really a socially pressing issue, just something I wondered about since it personally takes me an eternity to grow a beard…

Cosby asked if the presence of adult companies like Vivid was the reason many girls, who eventually never make names for themselves, ruin themselves on booze, drugs, and/or sex in trying to break into the biz (I’m paraphrasing her words). In other words, she wanted to know if porn studios promoted these girls’ bad behavior. 7.) What kind of question is that? A lot of men and women alike go to Hollywood seeking fame and fortune as actors, and a lot of them wind up down and out and ultimately failures. 8.) Should America abolish its movie industry because of that reason?

And concerning the woman (I forget her name) who thought that the whole Rita Cosby Porn Valley show was a puff piece that only showcased the upside of porn, 9.) What bee had gotten into her bonnet? She absolutely had nothing positive to say about porn or anyone involved in the industry. I believe, as the good doctor Laura Berman said, even something like porn has some socially redeeming value.

10.) Incidentally, how many of you actually thought it was a puff piece if you saw it?

11.) Since when did Xobile, a subsidiary of AEBN (which is a well-known online adult payperview content distributor ), start offering movies for the Playstation Portable (PSP)? I really ought to start promoting that fact more extensively…

12.) By the way, how come I can never get an answer from the AEBN webmaster in reply to the many e-mails that I - as an affiliate of their program - send to him? (This question really has nothing to do with the show on MSNBC; it’s just an expression of how pissed off I am…)

13.) Does anyone know who Stephanie Morgan (I hope I got that name right), who was featured so prominently in the piece, is? She’s supposed to be some reasonably well-known pornstar who’s been in the porn biz for a while now but I can’t even find her name in the International Adult Film Database (iafd.com)…

14.) While we’re seeking identities, who the devil was that gorgeous chick who was with Mercedez in the piece? They referred to her as Lac(e)y but I’m not absolutely sure how that’s spelled or what her last name is. 15.) How am I supposed to find more pictures of and jerk off to someone whose last name I don’t know? (A rather tongue-in-cheek question but a question none-the-less…)

15.) And I bet you didn’t know so many people were involved in your “private” online chat session with your favorite cyber-girl, did you? All of those people monitoring the bank of computers and relaying your dirty little requests to the performers…

16.) Did anyone know that veteran porn actor (and one of my heroes, I might add) Randy Spears is married with children? And apparently he has been so for a long time now. 17.) Would his current relationship, in its early beginnings, have coincided at all with the one that he had with Tera Patrick? ;)

And while I’m on the subject of Spears, if I hear one more straight male pornstar say that their profession isn’t all it’s cracked up to be (as I heard in the piece), I’m going to bellow. 18.) Who do they think they’re fooling? I realize that they are pros at what they do but the actors are certainly not hanging around for the pay; so it must be for the endless amount of sex with beautiful babes…

19.) Who knew that there existed a pair of real breasts among the Vivid girls (at least I think they’re real) in the person of Monique Alexander? Just kidding (kind of): there might be another 3 or 4 pairs among all 32 or so of the girls…

20.) Finally, is it me or does Ms. Cosby look like she could be a porn starlet herself? She certainly has that blond, bubbly personality thing happening and she’s by no means hard to look at. I’m just throwing the idea out there…

Wednesday, December 14, 2005

Porn DVD Review: Jenna Loves Pain

Jenna Loves PainSometimes when I review a movie, the subject matter is not necessarily something I’m into. So in those cases I just try to present the material as it was presented to me (when I viewed it) and let the reader who is interested in said sexual activity be the final judge as to whether the material is for him or her.

That being said , I think I can definitely say without hesitation that
Jenna Loves Pain is more (or equally as) erotic and sensual than overtly sexual. Sure there are blatant sexual parts to the DVD, but not as much as in your basic adult run-of-the-mill fare. In other words, it’s more of a chick-flick as far as porn is concerned.

And that’s a bold assertion considering that the movie is basically a gonzo production, which is not really a female fan favorite. There are certain narrative elements to the piece as told by Jenna Jameson’s (the main character as you can tell from the title) entries into her personal diary. But that’s as far as any semblance of a storyline goes. There are four BDSM scenes that for the most part follow one right after the other.

Let me start by saying, the production values are excellent: the sound is great; and the lighting, the mood, and the camera shots are picture-perfect. It’s very good to look at. But the movie gets a little too cute for its own good sometimes, with the slow-motion tracks, the intentional blurring effects, and the occasional change to black-and-white footage. Like I said, Pain is definitely a “Porn for Women” niche film.

I will , in describing the sex scenes, leave out some of the lesser minutiae for the perspective viewer to discover himself or herself. It’s more fun for you that way, and trust me there are some things to discover. (All I will say at this juncture is watch out for the clothespins. :))

The first scene involves Jameson and Fujiko Kano, the latter being in a submissive role (I think she plays Jameson’s servant). Kano is bound, bent over Jameson’s knee, and beaten with a hairbrush. And then things start to heat up…Throughout the scene, Kano is made to orally satisfy various parts of Jameson’s body. As I’ve intimated already, Jameson is totally in control in this scene, something you’ve all seen before with regularity in Jameson’s previous girl-girl scenes (ho-hum). This scene is, as I like to say, just Jenna-being-Jenna.

In the next episode of Jenna Loves Pain , Nina Hartley plays domme to a submissive Amber Michaels. Hartley looks as if she was born to do this. She whips Michaels like it’s the most natural thing in the world - much like a cook in the kitchen baking a familiar recipe. She seems to be very much in her element and very adept at what she does.

And Michaels for her part sits/lies/grovels/kneels/bends-over there like a good little soldier. She moans and yells throughout the whole scene, and you as the viewer cannot tell whether she’s doing it out of pleasure or pain. And at the risk of casting sadistic aspersions, I would think the average viewer doesn’t care: it’s hot either way.

One thing very likable about this scene is that the producers keep the glam, artsy stuff to a bare minimum.

And then we have sexcapade three...Like I said before, I’ve seen Jameson in many lesbian scenes, and when it came down to who was the domme and who was the femme, she was always the one in charge. I’d never seen Jameson take a strap-on before, much less while she was being gagged and bound. Dru Berrymore - Jameson’s scene-mate - basically ties her to the bench here and makes her (Jameson) perform oral on her strapped-on dildo; then Berrymore takes said strap-on to her.

It’s definitely something you don’t see everyday, and it’s a nice change of pace from the usually dominant Jameson. Personally, this is the scene that put the Jenna Loves Pain DVD as a whole over the top for me. Up until now, I was beginning to wonder where the Pain was that Jenna supposedly loved.

The last scene involves Emily Marilyn and Ava Vincent. There’s quite a bit of flogging (again) with the recipient (Vincent, in this case) in an open, spread-eagle position: first with her standing up and later with her lying on her back. Jameson joins the scene later to make the scene merrier (I guess. You know the old saying...).

That’s the movie in a nutshell, but to reiterate, there are lots of other little surprises and “contraptions” that the average viewer (who is relatively not familiar to the BDSM sex-style) can discover. So, what the heck? I say, “Bring the Pain!”

Jenna Loves Pain DVD
Jenna Loves Pain Trailer


Wednesday, December 07, 2005

A Sense of En-title-ment

I always get a kick out of perusing creative porn titles. Now that the 2006 AVN Awards nominee list is out, let’s see what DVD and video monikers we can make fun of today...

Bad News Bitches : Now that’s what I call a title. It’s short, it’s blatant and direct (some women might even consider it insulting), it’s something that piques your interest as a man, and - last but not least - it’s a good play on words (you’ve heard of the mainstream flick Bad News Bears, right?).

Straight A Students: The first time I saw this title it cracked me up, because I knew immediately what they meant without having to read the synopsis of the DVD. And it’s a catchy title because:
A (pun intended). It tells us right up front yet in a leering, rib-nudging manner what the participants are all about (anal sex);
B. How quick and eager they are to do those acts (straight away, immediately); and
C. It tells us it’s about coed, possibly teen girls, which is - need I say - a big draw.

My Ass is Haunted: Where do I begin with this title? First of all, if your ass truly is haunted, you really ought to have that looked into (teehee). So who do you call? A ghostbuster, an assbuster, or maybe both?
And how big does your ass have to be to be inhabited by dead spirits? In looking at the credits I see that my girl Katja Kassin is in the picture...Oh, that big...

War of the Girls: Another clever spin on a non-adult production title. This DVD is not to be confused with the Tom Cruise summer-blockbusted (yes, I said that right) War of the Worlds. I sure hope the porn DVD had relatively more success that the mainstream feature.

Semen Demons: It has a nice ring to it, it rolls right off the tongue (I would imagine that that probably is a play on words even though I personally haven’t seen the video), and it’s just fun to say over and over. Besides it’s short and to the point and everyone knows what the theme is about (cumshots) without it being explicitly said. And you sort of get the feeling that the theme is an obsession. Similarly, see Cheek Freaks (where it’s all about the ass).

Short quiz: Can you guess , specifically, the theme or porn niche of the following DVDs based solely on their titles (without searching an online adult DVD retailer site, or googling the phrases, or otherwise cheating :)) ?

Anal Retentive
Mouth 2 Mouth 2
Glazed & Confused 4
Innocence: Perfect Pink
Re-Penetrator
Big Toys No Boys

Last but not least, in terms of new titles we have the soon-to-be-released Black Girls Wanna Cracker, where ebony women play dominant roles to white guys‘ submissive ones. That’s a classic title if there ever was one. Let’s face it, the porn industry has never been nor will ever be known for its political-correctness. And you thought Sierra Has A Negro Problem was bad...

Monday, December 05, 2005

Porn DVD Review: Kill Girl Kill 2

I’ve been doing these reviews for a while and in reviewing movies, it’s still kind of hard to not let my personal preferences affect my objective review. Up until now, I think I’ve done very well in not letting my own personal standards on what is pretty in a woman (for example) not affect how I rate a DVD. At some point I might let my attraction - or lack thereof - for the women in a DVD color my judgment. (After all, I’m only human like any other reviewer. :)) And this might be the day that that happens...

Kill Girl Kill 2 is a gonzo production, and it consists of 5 scenes featuring women that represent the Goth subculture. All of the women are au naturel (meaning that none of them bear breast implants). And to tell you the truth, if given a choice between a DVD full of “natural” women and a DVD full of women with implants, I would choose - and I know a lot of men would not agree with me on this - the former.

Now I’d be the first person to admit that Goth girls are not my bag, and I am not attracted to the dark makeup, shiny black leather outfits, piercings, and extensive tattoos that are a hallmark of the subculture. And the intro music (which kicks in upon the opening of each sex act), too, in Kill Girl Kill 2 - not my kind of music. And in a lot of cases it isn’t even music. In those cases, the sound consists of random electric chords and (what sounded like) electric feedback, which is all jarring to my ears. But I appreciate the fact that the production editors have the presence of mind and decency to cut the music altogether (and not let it linger in the background) relatively quickly when each sex couple starts to get hot and heavy.

And I’ve said this in the past concerning background and intro music I’ve heard that I’ve actually liked. It’s just plain common courtesy to the people who are watching who don’t like that kind of music (after all, no one comes to a skin flick for the music in the first place. It‘s just kind of thrust upon one whether one likes it or not.). Besides, I prefer to hear natural love-making sounds - heavy breathing, kissing slurps, smacking of flesh-on-flesh, moaning, etc. - anyway.


Yet with all of my pre-conceived biases out in the open and acknowledged, I (and I’m sure a lot of you would feel the same way if you were to watch ) still found it very hard to sit through the first scene. A girl simply known as Deja appears to be - or at least that’s the impression that the producers were trying to create - strung out on some mood-altering substance. The first shot we have of her is her sitting on a couch trying to stymie a nose-bleed. The next thing I knew, she’s closely examining a painting depicting Jesus.

That pretty much did it for me: I was pretty much sold at that point that I wasn‘t going to like the rest of the scene, and the scene didn’t disappoint in that respect. I didn’t prefer the girl‘s look; I didn’t like the fact that she was supposed to be (or actually was) on something (call me crazy, but I like viewing women having sex while they’re lucid and not drunk or high); and at the end of the scene after the comshot, she thanks Jesus for the sex she just had. WTF?!

The second episode is a HUGE improvement. It features this pretty young little Asian girl named - and how appropriate is this name? - Yumy. The guy in the scene pretty much fingers and eats her cute pussy (yummy indeed) good and proper, and then takes her brutally doggy-style. And she seems to enjoy every single moment of it. (But that’s not very surprising: we all know that Asian girls in this society love their white guys. :)) In this scene, the guy is much more the alternative-lifestyle representative; he is the one pretty much covered from head to toe in tats (to those who know him, think Spyder Jonez).

I’m on the fence about the third scene, there’s just something I didn’t like about it. I definitely didn‘t like their looks (and I know I‘ve probably rehashed this point to death, and will continue to do so ad nauseam. Forgive me for that…) nor their sense of fashion, but it was more than that. There just seemed to be no energy to the scene.

The scene is between two girls Justine Joli and Jade Starr. It starts slow which is what you would expect for a typical lesbian tryst. But it never seems to pick up any momentum. Sure the dildos and vibrators come out and they smile often enough, but it seems like their hearts are not in it. This scene is a big disappointment to me coming off the last one.

And I just found out that this particular scene of Kill Girl Kill 2 is nominated for a 2006 AVN Award in the category of Best All-Girl Sex Scene in a Video. I don’t get it. I guess I just prefer my scenes with more energy.

The fourth scene, in my view, is very decent. The girl - Zoe Matthews - is very cute, behind all the Goth get-up (again, that’s just my personal view coming through) , and there’s just more energy to the sex here. Interestingly , as much as I like this scene there’s really not that much to say about it. Even though there’s no anal here, I feel that the scene is solid: short and to the point.

Jezebelle Bond is featured in the last scene, and (again) she’s not my type, but she looks like she’s having fun here. The set-up (I.e. background) is interesting to say the least. And she seems to have good chemistry with the guy. This might be the best episode (along with the Yumy sexcapade) of the bunch.

Taking the whole Kill Girl Kill 2 DVD in stock, there’s no lack of anal . As a matter of fact 3 of the 4 boy-girl scenes have anal. So based on the fact that the viewer pretty much gets what he’s expecting going in (if said viewer knows that this is a SuicideGirls - esque presentation), and despite the fact that two-fifths of the film is found lacking in my opinion, Kill Girl Kill 2 is not terrible. If you’re into the Goth look, fashion, and general way of life, the DVD is worth your time.

I wish I could say the same for the very short scene that occurs after the credits roll. I really could have done without that...

Kill Girl Kill 2

Friday, December 02, 2005

Offended by an Offender

I read an article on this guy that started both an organization and a crusade to (to hear him put it) end children and women rape, and the particulars of the situation didn't exactly sit well with me.

First of all viewing porn, much less frequenting strip clubs or patronizing adult bookstores, has no bearing on whether one is going to be a sexual predator. What about the priests in the Catholic Church? They do not (or at least they should not, anyway) do either of those things, yet some of them are guilty of molesting young boys.

It seems that this guy, in his zeal to assuage his guilty conscience for what he did in the past, is over-compensating big-time. From his avenue of attack (targeting legitimate adult businesses), I’m guessing that he used to go to such places and it eventually landed him in jail as a criminal. So he figured that if he were to eliminate such places, all of society’s sexual deviance and sex crimes would be solved. It doesn’t work that way.

Second of all, he’s not only targeting legit adult businesses, he’s harassing those private individuals and patrons that back them. What gives him the right to take the pictures of law-abiding citizens who are just exercising their Free Speech Amendment rights, and post them on his website? That would be akin to me starting a cyber-registry - which included names and addresses - of people who purchased guns because I don’t particularly like guns (which I don‘t), and because I shot someone years ago by accident.

My point being that the purchase of guns (much like the viewing or sale of legal pornography) is also protected by the Constitution, and just because it can lead to heinous results (in the guns’ case, death, dismemberment, paralysis, permanent injury and/or permanent scars) doesn’t make the gun purchase any less of a protected right.

For the most part, one must already have it within oneself to do physical harm to another human being in order to make the leap from simple pornophile to a sexual molester. The majority of people who are addicted to porn or smut or adult material or whatever you want to call it, just wind up ruining their own personal lives, jobs, relationships, friendships, health, and/or finances.

Just ask Kirk Franklin...